Paul Tassi wrote a Eulogy for Google+ in Forbes. He goes to great lengths to talk about the tumbleweed blowing through his G+ page. But let me point out two pieces of information here:
How many friends does he have on Facebook?
One simple click takes me back to Facebook, and my wall is flooded with updates and pictures from 400+ friends.
How many friends does he have on Google+?
As active as I am in social media and the latest and greatest internet trends, I have 26 people who have added me into circles, only 8 of them being people I wanted to add back, as for all Plus’s claims of privacy and intimacy, I don’t know most of the others.
400+ vs. 8. Is it any wonder that he feels it’s useless? You get out of it what you put into it. If you’re only going to bother adding 8 people, you’re not going to see much. If, on the other hand, you added 400+ people, many of whom you don’t actually know, so that you’re not listening to an echo chamber of your friends, then maybe you might actually discover that the value of the service. I would also point out that he states that he only added people who added him first. That is just user apathy.
It’s poor journalism to call the death knell of something you haven’t even bothered to use properly.